site stats
Welcome, register | help | log in

Contrary to PHR Vendor Hype, Privacy Remains the "Elephant in the Room"

Featured in:

A slew of recent stories offer clues to what would really chill widespread PHR adoption. Privacy issue just will not go away.

A few weeks ago I posted some commentary on the battle of Google vs. Microsoft in PHR arena. My thinking was that the motivation to use such tools could prove to be a bigger obstacle than privacy.

Looking at recent PHR coverage I would opine that privacy still might end up being the biggest issue after all. If anything as a key "de-motivator" of adoption, even if not spoken directly. Make no mistake, what PHR vendors say about their intentions does not matter. It is what consumers and providers hear.

So what DO they hear and what does this MEAN?

Health Train Express

Featured in:

For the past several months I have been focused on reviewing and reading many different blogs, and participating in a number of social networking

For the past several months I have been focused on reviewing and reading many different blogs, and participating in a number of social networking blogs, both healthcare related and in other areas of interest.  My original blog topics on RHIO have been expanced to other areas, including public policy making, consumer activities, healthcare financing, and forecasting.  I use a weegee board and an old bottle I used to use for "spin the bottle"...It should be as accurate or more so, than the ideas today's pundits offer us.  Check these out at

Newsflash: Offline Word-of-Mouth Still Matters for Pharma!

Featured in:

Keller Fay reports that word-of-mouth is more important offline than online. The data is interesting but somewhat misleading.

Last week on HealthcareVox I saw an interesting post with a provocative title: "Keller Fay Group: Pharma Should Stop Salivating Over Social Media". This seemed controversial, so I decided to investigate.

The main thesis of the report by Keller Fay Group, is that offline word-of-mouth should be more important for pharma marketing than online. That is not surprising talk from the firm specializing in offline word-of-mouth. But does the research suggest that online WOM should be dismissed?

In one word "NO". Offline is important, but online has room to grow

More on hospital food

Featured in:

If we do not get the nutrition we need, our bodies re-allocate the resources to heal the injured/sick tissue, causing body depletion.

Well, after my post on hospital food was first published, I was asked to take part in a short interview on the subject on Shelagh Rogers’ show, Sounds Like Canada
on CBC radio. What a thrilling opportunity to discuss real food! The interview was fast-paced and over before I knew it. Here is some of what I did not have an opportunity to say:

Nephrologist Quits Medicine to Blog Full-Time: Personal vs. Professional Use of Social Media

Featured in:

Imagine a doctor quitting his day job to make blogging a career. Dr. Arnold Kim did just that, but he is not a typical medblogger.

This Sunday, while perusing tech industry news on Silicon Alley Insider I saw an interesting post about "The Unlikely Career Path Of MacRumors' Arnold Kim", who so happens to be a physician.

This is quite amazing, since for most blogging physicians, online publishing is mostly a hobby. Sometimes it supports professional endeavors, but rarely in a direct way. An outlet of opinions, a venue to influence healthcare dialog, even opportunity to promote themselves. But full-time?

Dr. Kim's story shows how a personal blog can turn into a career

Hospital food - an opportunity waiting?

Featured in:

A commentary on the extremely poor quality food served in hospitals. How can people heal if the food served is not nutritious?

I probably should have written this a year and a half ago when I had an intimate look at hospital food at a large Vancouver hospital. Ya gotta wonder whether this hospital at least, knows that there is any connection between food and health! From what I could tell, the food was largely highly processed, cooked to death, and they always served a sweet packaged dessert! What’s with that??? We KNOW that sugar suppresses immune systems. So why is sugar fed to people that are trying to get well? And margarine and creamer/milker were on the menu each day. No butter or cream here! Important to get your daily dose of trans fats and hydrogenated oils, after all. Much better choice than saturated fat, which our bodies need to get the vitamins and minerals into our cells. Oh yeah. Food cooked to death so I guess there are no vitamins left to transport. No worries then - no transportation needed. By offering up trans fats, cell messaging will be blocked instead. That will help people heal.

What Makes For Happiness? A Little Wellness Quiz

Featured in:

Why bother being healthy? You're going to die anyway?

Health 2.0 Accelerator Launch

Featured in:

Health 2.0 Accelerator starts with first project "Drug Profile Interoperability".

Matthew Holt and Indu Subaiya, MD are up to it again. They recently launched a wiki “Health Accelerator 2.0“ which was inspired by Dr.

R.I.P. PHR Privacy? Viacom vs. Google Lawsuit Sets Precedent for Breaking Privacy Promises

Featured in:

Judge authorizes a fishing expedition, forces Google to release YouTube logs. Imagine if that happened to your health records.

Internet privacy is under attack. Last week, the ongoing lawsuit of Viacom against YouTube / Google led to an extremely disturbing development - a court order to turn your video viewing records over to Viacom.

New York Times has details here: "Google Told to Turn Over User Data of YouTube". The key fact is that Viacom will be given access to the records on EVERYvideo watched since YouTube founding in 2005, supposedly to investigate copyright violation patterns. If you ever watched a YouTube video, that means your user IDs, IP addresses and videos will be handed over.

Why does this story matter, in particular for online health records?

US health care, the best in the world?

Featured in:

What no one ever mentions is how that statement ever became accepted as fact

I often hear the statement

The US has the best health care system in the world

But what no one ever mentions is how that statement came to be accepted as fact.

Does the US have more and better trained doctors, per capita, than the rest of the world? Does the US have better trained nurses, and higher nurse to patient ratios in hospitals? Do we have fewer infections or deaths per capita? Does everyone have equal access to the same lever of care in the US?

I guess it must be true, since I never hear any talk about improving the quality of care. The only talk I hear about improving US health care, revolves around the greater use of electronic medical records, making health insurance portable, and oh yeah the need for transparency in pricing .  

Hopefully someone can enlighten me on the criteria used to make that statement, because I sure haven't seen any indication of that being true.

User login

make my day make my day again